Behind The Scene with Hector Montalvo
  • Behind the scene
  • Up coming show
  • DOR/Child Support info
  • Family court/209A
  • Judge Mary Manzi
  • Blog
  • Links

Pro-Se Coordinator

1/29/2010

0 Comments

 
Dear John Cross, Pro Se Coordinator  
Thank you for replying
The idea of "Due Process" is well over 800 years old, dating back to
the time of the Magna Carta. The founding fathers of this great nation
used many of its ideas to form our Constitution. In fact, Due Process
is mentioned in both the 5th and 14th Amendments. Perhaps, the 14
amendment, section 1 is the most applicable to my particular issue:

... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The Supreme Court has said that the above statement applies to state
actors of which Judge So and So is legally and gainfully employed by
the state.

Section 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

Judge Manzi, have denied me Due Process as allowed by the Constitution and in direct violation of  The Commonwealth Judicial Cannon of Ethics.   While you may not be able to intervene in individual
cases, you do have the power to stop this clearly illegal, unconstitutional stall tactic.   Therefore, the practice of permission to file should be stopped or seriously curtailed.  It is an effective tool, that deprives litigants of their rights,   And speaking of litigants   Another practice that must stop and stop now, is the practice of the Lawyers for the Department of Child support representing the woman who files complaints for contempt   These lawyers are there ONLY to provide the court with assistance in the litigants financial records, (That's it)  They are not there to speak for the woman, add money to the woman's claims, and they are not allowed to do so under the law , But this practice has been going on since 1992   This practice also deprives a litigant from their due process, and it must stop   
0 Comments

    Behind the Scene with Hector Montalvo

    Blog on letters I have sent to work on solving some of the issues 

    Archives

    November 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    2009 Vawa
    Can I Film Paula
    Case Law
    Chief Justice Mulligan
    Chief Justice Paula Carey
    Chief Paula Carey
    Child Support
    Commission On Judicial Conduct
    Court Charged With Corruption
    Dor Stop This
    Dv Against Men
    Father Proves Court Tapes Were Altered
    Judge Amy Blake
    Judge Stahlin
    Letter To Sjc
    Missing Files In Probate
    Paula Are You Reading
    Pro-Se Coordinator
    Review Of Contempt Order
    Sen Baddour
    State House Meeting On 2-11-10
    Thank You Dor
    They Work For Us
    What Is Paula Hiding
    Will Paula Resign

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.